![pradaxa_banner_hero](/my/sites/default/files/2024-02/pradaxa_banner_hero.jpg)
Pradaxa |
Prevent the stroke
Did you know? For decades vitamin K antagonists remained the gold standard for stroke prevention in AF, thanks to their high efficacy.1
Pradaxa® 150mg was also the first and only non-vitamin K anticoagulant that has proved a relative risk reduction versus warfarin for ischemic or unspecified strokes by 24%*[2-4]
Please take a look at further findings from the landmark study of Pradaxa®, RE-LY®, that changed the approach to stroke prevention in
AF[2-5]:
![](/my/sites/default/files/2024-01/Prevent%20the%20stroke%20image_1.jpg)
Have you ever considered the effectiveness of anticoagulation in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D)?
In 2017 Anna Plitt post-hoc RE-LY® analysis Pradaxa® 150mg among all NOACs has demonstrated superiority versus warfarin in both group of patients with, or without T2D[6]:
![](/my/sites/default/files/2024-01/Prevent%20the%20stroke%20image_3.jpg)
Footnotes
* 1.34% per year in the 110mg dabigatran group, 0.92% per year in the 150mg dabigatran and 1.21% per year in the warfarin group (relative risk for 150mg vs warfarin 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.97 P=0.03)
References
-
1.
Hart RG et al Ann Intern Med 2007 Jun 19;146(12):857-67.
-
2.
Connolly SJ et al N Engl J Med 2009 Sep 17;361(12):1139-51.
-
3.
Connolly SJ et al N Engl J Med 2010 Nov 4;363(19):1875-6.
-
4.
Connolly SJ et al N Engl J Med 2014;371:1464-1465.
-
5.
Hindricks G et al Eur Heart J 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498.
-
6.
Plitt A et al JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Apr 1;2(4):442-448.
Graphic ‘Dabigatran vs. warfarin‘ adapted from Connolly et al. 20092, Connolly et al. 20103, Connolly et al. 2014[4]
Graphic ‘RE-LY’ adapted from Plitt et al. 2017[6]